Skip to main content

Review of the Handbook of Functional MRI Data Analysis"


Available at Amazon.

So, you want to analyze fMRI data?  Here's a good place to start.  

Historically, researchers wanting to learn fMRI techniques have had to apprentice themselves to one or several senior researchers who have mastered the techniques.  This is still arguably the best way to familiarize oneself with everything since learning Linux/Unix and how to navigate several image processing packages can get a bit hairy in the beginning and a guiding hand is very much appreciated.  

That said, nearly everyone I know in this field also gets a textbook.  Huettel's Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.  This is *the* book to get if you really want to know the ins and outs of MRI physics, analysis, preprocessing etc.  But it is very dense.  Huettel's book is meant to be approached chronologically with new information building on what you learned in previous chapters making it an excellent textbook for a course on this subject.  It also becomes an invaluable reference for those who know the subject and want to quickly consult something.  

However, for someone who is being introduced to fMRI, or even a seasoned researcher who is simply more interested in the analysis methods than the physics, a new alternative came out last year.  A book by Russell Poldrack, Jeannette Mumford and Thomas Nichols (all well respected researchers using fMRI) focusses exclusively on preprocessing and analysis techniques.  

The book is really quite excellent, and eminantly readable - I read several chapters on my flight to Virginia.  It covers the regular univariate single subject and group analyses, and also discusses multivariate and machine learning approaches - very useful if you like me have previously only used one or two analysis techniques and read reports of others without necessarily knowing the theoretical drive behind them.  Very often the authors will present a list of things you the researcher will need to do in order to acomplish analysis 'x', they also provide links to various tools and more in depth resources should you wish to focus on any technique in more detail.  It's also very easy to select a topic of interest and simply read that chapter to get a good overview, while one can read the book in chronological order, it is not necessary to do so.  For instance I was very intertested to read the chapters about visualizing activation data and multivariate approaches - I read those first and then went back to the beginning

The book is an wonderful overview of current fMRI analysis techniques and I would recommend it to anyone interested in this field, it's also one of the books I intend to keep on my shelf for a long time (or at least until the next edition comes out).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Video games allow for multitasking? A review of "Improving multi-tasking ability through action videogames"

W ould you believe that playing video games could make you more likely to succeed as a pilot? There's been quite a bit of colloquial evidence on multitasking and task-switching floating around the internet recently, thanks in no small part to work by Ophir et al., (2009) who showed that people who are habitual media-multitaskers (i.e. those annoying people who text while watching a movie or even worse while driving) tend to perform worse on a wide variety of cognitive measures of attention.  They concluded that people who are chronic media multitaskers have a "leaky filter", and as such cannot block out irrelevant (and distracting) information.  This agrees nicely other theories of attention, and particularly inhibitory theory (Hasher & Zacks, Michael C. Anderson, Gazzaley). One reason that multitasking has come under such scrutiny is that it is now encouraged and even expected in many professions and by many employers.  Even in situations where multitasking...

Dopamine helps the brain change gears: A review of "Dopamine-supports coupling of attention-related networks."

Before we begin, some background information... It seems that networks and the idea of connectivity is on everybody's minds these days (pardon the pun).  It's a fairly safe bet to say that nearly everyone affiliated with neuroscience has more than a passing familiarity with the default mode and dorsal attention networks (i.e. see Raichle et al., 2001).  These networks are anticorrelated which is to say that when one is being more heavily accessed, the activity in the other is suppressed.  Broadly, the default mode is active at rest, during mind wandering and when thinking about the autobiographical past - it has been described as being related to internally directed attention.  The dorsal attention or task positive network on the other hand is engaged when attention needs to be directed outwards at a cognitively demanding task or situation.  From Dang et al., 2012 What about the frontoparietal cognitive control network?  This network was discove...

On the use and abuse of Hairballs. What might graph-theory mean for cognitive neuroscience?

Olaf Sporns Discovering the Human Connectome H aving just returned from the OHBM (Organization for Human Brain Mapping) it's not hard to be phenomenally ecstatic about the state of research and raring to apply new techniques and theories to my data.   There is much to be hopeful for; I encountered many brilliant people who are excited about their research and how neuroscience is helping to unlock the secrets of the mind. That said, there did seem to be a great deal of research that was following the coat-tails of last year's big ideas.  This year the "big thing" was graph theory - the branch of mathematics and computer science that was previously applied to other fields such as social network visualization and biology  by Olaf Sporns and applied to brain networks.   Graph theory works on the notion that you can reduce a matrix (normally a correlation matrix) to a set of nodes (which represent specific brain regions) and edges (which represent either phys...