Skip to main content

Maintenance or Reserve? Perhaps we should strive for both.


Image from http://www.homecarephoenixnow.com/
A recent review of the effects of age on episodic and working memory by Nyberg et al., (2012) has taken the interesting view that rather than focusing on cognitive and brain reserve, scientists and clinicians should instead look at 'maintenance'. Typically, reserve is taken to mean some physiological (in the case of brain reserve), or cognitive/social/contextual (in the case of cognitive reserve) advantage that allows for the maintenance of brain function in the face of decline due to pathology or disease. By way of example, older adults who have been lifelong balanced bilinguals (meaning that they speak both languages equally often) are more likely to to show preserved cognitive abilities despite showing MCI or AD pathology. These same individuals while holding on to normalcy longer, also experience a more rapid onset and decline suggesting that their 'reserve' actually masks the pathology and ironically may prevent their getting treatment as quickly as someone who starts manifesting mild symptoms earlier (Schweizer et al., in press). 
 By contrast, the concept of 'maintenance' according to Nyberg et al., is less based on what people have done across their lives to store up reserve, but more on the circumstances that exist for them in their present old age. Things like having favourable genetics, exercising, eating well, being social, continuing to 'use it', either by having a cognitively demanding job, or otherwise, are all factors that affect the ability of the individual to maintain their brain health and not have to rely on reserve in the face of pathology.
I have to admit, my initial reaction to this paper was - "do we really need another term that for all intents and purposes seems implied by the definitions of brain and cognitive reserve?"  My answer is yes - though it took some reflection (and actually starting to write this review) to realize it. It is also more appealing I think to examine individual differences in the light of what can be done by older adults in the present moment to stave off decline as an addition to the concept of a lifetime of healthy behaviour.
This paper does an excellent job of hilighting the emerging idea that aging is not a uniform process. There is no single linear model that will account for everyone's decline, and indeed there is much that can can be done to stave off deterioration so that reserve is hopefully unnecessary.  
Nyberg, L., Lövdén, M., Riklund, K., Lindenberger, U., & Bäckman, L. (2012). Memory aging and brain maintenance. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(5), 292-305. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.04.005
Schweizer, T., Ware, J., Fischer, C.E., Craik, F.I.M., & Bialystok, E. (in press). Bilingualism as a contributor to cognitive reserve: Evidence from brain atrophy in Alzheimer’s disease. Cortex

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Video games allow for multitasking? A review of "Improving multi-tasking ability through action videogames"

W ould you believe that playing video games could make you more likely to succeed as a pilot? There's been quite a bit of colloquial evidence on multitasking and task-switching floating around the internet recently, thanks in no small part to work by Ophir et al., (2009) who showed that people who are habitual media-multitaskers (i.e. those annoying people who text while watching a movie or even worse while driving) tend to perform worse on a wide variety of cognitive measures of attention.  They concluded that people who are chronic media multitaskers have a "leaky filter", and as such cannot block out irrelevant (and distracting) information.  This agrees nicely other theories of attention, and particularly inhibitory theory (Hasher & Zacks, Michael C. Anderson, Gazzaley). One reason that multitasking has come under such scrutiny is that it is now encouraged and even expected in many professions and by many employers.  Even in situations where multitasking...

Dopamine helps the brain change gears: A review of "Dopamine-supports coupling of attention-related networks."

Before we begin, some background information... It seems that networks and the idea of connectivity is on everybody's minds these days (pardon the pun).  It's a fairly safe bet to say that nearly everyone affiliated with neuroscience has more than a passing familiarity with the default mode and dorsal attention networks (i.e. see Raichle et al., 2001).  These networks are anticorrelated which is to say that when one is being more heavily accessed, the activity in the other is suppressed.  Broadly, the default mode is active at rest, during mind wandering and when thinking about the autobiographical past - it has been described as being related to internally directed attention.  The dorsal attention or task positive network on the other hand is engaged when attention needs to be directed outwards at a cognitively demanding task or situation.  From Dang et al., 2012 What about the frontoparietal cognitive control network?  This network was discove...

Reaction times (RTs) - what to do with them?

I t's raining today, and I've just emerged from reading a selection of articles on time memory in animals with a view to answering the question "can animals experience episodic memory?"  Turns out that's a pain to answer since there are plenty of mechanisms that can masquerade as reliving an event including learning semantic rules and intervals .  The upshot is we still don't know.  The nice thing about my field however is that when theory tends towards the nebulous - and it frequently does, I can focus on methods for a while to take my mind off things... So, I've run an experiment and have a whole set of reaction times that I'm itching to analyze.  What are my options?  Any good statistician will tell you to plot your data first.  In fact, should you go to see them for advice, they will, with a vague air of distressed incredulity, tell you to go off and plot your data.  Usually I feel slightly ashamed for not having done this already, ...